OpenStats
openstats.ca
Drinking Water Quality and Supply

Quispamsis Drinking Water Quality

By OpenStats · Built from official Canadian sources

Direct municipal data
B

Water quality grade

Good

Graded against Health Canada drinking water guidelines

Lead within guidelinepH in range
Hardness vs provincial average146 mg/L · prov. avg 169 mg/L
Lead vs provincial average0.2 μg/L · prov. avg 0.2 μg/L
Hardness
146 mg/L
Lead
0.2 μg/L
≤ 5 μg/L
pH
7.3999999999999995
6.5–8.5 range
Hardness
146 mg/L
Hard
Lead
0.2 μg/L
Max: 5 μg/L
pH
7.4
6.5–8.5
Chlorine
0.7 mg/L
Max: 4 mg/L

As an Amazon Associate, OpenStats earns from qualifying purchases.

Partner

Lab water test for Quispamsis taps

Municipal reports cover the plant. A Tap Score kit tests the water at a Quispamsis tap for a broader contaminant panel.

Order a lab water test →

Lab kit partner link. We may earn a commission when tracking is active.

Partner

Waterdrop filtration systems

Under-sink and RO systems from Waterdrop Canada — a direct brand alternative to marketplace filters.

Shop Waterdrop filters →

Waterdrop affiliate link. We may earn a commission.

Compare filters · Water test kits · Hardness guide

Reading this page

Quispamsis's drinking water earns Grade B (Good). Hardness is 146 mg/L (hard), and pH is 7.4 against Health Canada's 6.5–8.5 guideline.

Lead at 0.2 μg/L is below the 5 μg/L maximum, and fluoride is 0.5 mg/L against a guideline of ≤ 1.5 mg/L.

How to use this page: read the headline metric and provincial comparison first, then supply and treatment notes, then the source footer for the underlying dataset.

Watershed to tap

Supply and treatment

How Quispamsis draws, treats, and distributes drinking water, from municipal and utility publications. Chemistry grades above come from separate parameter records; this section does not invent plant lab figures.

Source type

Surface water

Research confidence: medium

Source waters

  • surface

Treatment plants

  • Quispamsis Water Treatment Plant

    From municipal open data or regional estimate (verify locally).

Cited sources

Outbound municipal or utility citations pending. See methodology for how supply research is gathered.

Supply notes summarize published utility materials. They are not a substitute for the issuing authority's current notices or for a licensed tap test.

Health parameters meet Health Canada limits; turbidity above the 1 NTU typical target.

Health parameters meet Health Canada limits; turbidity exceeds the typical 1 NTU aesthetic target.

Figure 1 · Supply chain

From watershed to tap

Compared to provincial average

New Brunswick · 16 cities in sample

Hardness (city vs New Brunswick avg)146 mg/L
pH (city vs New Brunswick avg)7.3999999999999995
Lead (city vs New Brunswick avg)0.2 μg/L
Fluoride (city vs New Brunswick avg)0.5 mg/L

Provincial average: hardness 169 mg/L · pH 7.6 · lead 0.2 μg/L · fluoride 0.6 mg/L

Full parameters

ParameterReadingHealth Canada guidelineStatus
Hardness146 mg/LNo health limit (aesthetic)Compliant
pH7.46.5–8.5Compliant
Lead0.2 μg/L≤ 5 μg/LCompliant
Fluoride0.5 mg/L≤ 1.5 mg/LCompliant
Chlorine (free)0.7 mg/L≤ 4 mg/LCompliant
Turbidity2.7 NTU≤ 1 NTU (typical target)Exceeds guideline
Alberta water licences

WaterRegister.ca

On a private well or holding an Alberta water allocation licence? Water Register maps EPA licence records, transfer comparables, and watershed context across the province.

Explore WaterRegister.ca →

Drinking water filters and test kits

Pitcher and under-sink filters, plus hardness strips and TDS meters for tap checks.

As an Amazon Associate, OpenStats earns from qualifying purchases.

· Compare options

Source · ECCC / municipal open data (seed). Last updated 2026-09-01. Refreshed on the site's automated schedule.